Component testing with i3D® directly on small geometries and fasteners

Application

Component testing with local values on small geometries and fasteners

i3D® for component testing directly on small geometries, fasteners or local component areas: local yield strength Rᶦₚ₀,₂, tensile strength Rᶦₘ and further mechanical properties without a classical tensile specimen from the relevant zone.

QA Production
Automotive Medical Technology Defence

Component Testing

Why i3D® becomes technically strong for small geometries and fasteners

i3D® for component testing directly on small geometries, fasteners or local component areas: local yield strength Rᶦₚ₀,₂, tensile strength Rᶦₘ and further mechanical properties without a classical tensile specimen from the relevant zone.

Directly on small geometries and the real component

This application fits when local zones on small components, fasteners, threads, shank areas or other difficult-to-access geometries must be evaluated from a materials-mechanics perspective.

Local values instead of hardness conversion

i3D® delivers local material properties related to Rᶦₚ₀,₂, Rᶦₘ, ductility and hardening instead of relying only on empirical hardness-strength correlations.

Low-damage and low-preparation

Testing remains small-area and component-near, without cutting, milling or transferring the relevant zone into a standardised tensile specimen.

Valuable for QA, failure analysis and development

Especially for small parts, fasteners, austenitic materials or local edge zones, the direct component statement is often technically more relevant than a global substitute specimen.

Component testing with i3D®

The i3D® method evaluates mechanical properties directly on small geometries, fasteners and real component zones without first having to transfer them into a classical tensile specimen.

From a materials-testing perspective, what counts is the local statement at the technically relevant location. Screws are a typical example, but not the only meaningful use case.

  • directly on the fastener, small geometry or local component area
  • suitable for small, complex and difficult-to-access geometries
  • strong for component-near local material evaluation

Which properties are technically relevant

Yield strength Rᶦₚ₀,₂, tensile strength Rᶦₘ, ductility and hardening behaviour are the central results of the method.

For the materials-testing classification, it is important that these values do not come from a hardness conversion, but from the local indent and evaluation logic of the i3D® method.

  • Rᶦₚ₀,₂ and Rᶦₘ directly from local i3D® evaluation
  • additional statement on ductility and hardening
  • stronger than purely empirical hardness-strength correlations

Why small parts and fasteners are demanding

Threads, notch radii, coatings, local forming zones and small cross-sections make small parts and fasteners particularly demanding for classical tensile specimens and standard samples.

That is exactly why local, component-near materials testing is technically valuable here: the relevant zone is evaluated directly instead of being approximated only by a global substitute route.

  • suitable for thread root, shank, edge zone and locally treated areas
  • relevant for small geometries and austenitic materials
  • strong for fasteners, small parts and local problem zones

Practical relevance for QA and failure analysis

Quality assurance, material development and failure investigation are typical fields for this application because small parts and fasteners often need to be evaluated locally exactly there.

If failure starts in a small zone, a globalised testing statement is often not the technically best answer.

  • relevant for QA, complaints, failure analysis and development
  • local evaluation instead of only a global comparison specimen
  • strong when component protection and real geometry are decisive

Contacts

Discuss component, zone and testing target directly with the right contact

If small geometry, fastener, coating or a local problem zone defines the material question, the testing route should fit geometry, material and target values directly.

Saskia Siegert

Saskia Siegert

Head of Materials Testing Laboratory

Laboratory projects, materials analysis and testing workflows.

LinkedIn
Peter Zok

Peter Zok

Applications – Materials Testing

Application support, materials testing and technical customer guidance.

LinkedIn

Which component or fastener task would you like to clarify?

Describe the component, zone, material, target values and whether the task concerns QA, failure analysis, complaints or development. That makes it easier to coordinate the right testing route professionally.

Your contact details

Use this page for application clarification, a demo or a direct laboratory start.

Official form
We use essential cookies to run this website and, with your consent, cookies for statistics and marketing. Learn more .